Neal, J., 2013. Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (Yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument. Rerum Causae, 4(1), pp.7–13.

Neal J. Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (Yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument. Rerum Causae. 2013;4(1):7–13.

Neal, J. (2013). Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (Yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument. Rerum Causae, 4(1), 7–13.

1. Neal J. Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (Yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument. Rerum Causae. 2013;4(1):7-13.

Neal J, ‘Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument’ (2013) 4 Rerum Causae 7

Neal, Jacob. 2013. “Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument”. Rerum Causae 4 (1): 7–13.

Neal, Jacob. “Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument”. Rerum Causae 4, no. 1 (2013): 7–13.

Neal, J. “Why We Shouldn’t All Be Eliminative Materialists (Yet): Understanding the Failure of Churchland’s Argument”. Rerum Causae, vol. 4, no. 1, 2013, pp. 7–3.